[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d254758-4e5c-5dbc-b939-0d1ca4be03a5@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:55:46 +0800
From: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, yuzhao@...gle.com,
wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm/vmscan.c: avoid possible long latency caused by
too_many_isolated()
On 4/22/2021 6:23 PM, Hillf Danton wrote:
> Another option seems like we take a nap at the second time of lru tmi
> with some allocators in your case served without the 100ms delay.
Thanks, I will try it with my test cases.
--
Zhengjun Xing
Powered by blists - more mailing lists