| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e214f457-fcf0-c9ff-4574-93ed20298119@ozlabs.ru>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:04:06 +1000
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
To: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Add ddw_property_create()
and refactor enable_ddw()
On 22/04/2021 17:07, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Code used to create a ddw property that was previously scattered in
> enable_ddw() is now gathered in ddw_property_create(), which deals with
> allocation and filling the property, letting it ready for
> of_property_add(), which now occurs in sequence.
>
> This created an opportunity to reorganize the second part of enable_ddw():
>
> Without this patch enable_ddw() does, in order:
> kzalloc() property & members, create_ddw(), fill ddwprop inside property,
> ddw_list_new_entry(), do tce_setrange_multi_pSeriesLP_walk in all memory,
> of_add_property(), and list_add().
>
> With this patch enable_ddw() does, in order:
> create_ddw(), ddw_property_create(), of_add_property(),
> ddw_list_new_entry(), do tce_setrange_multi_pSeriesLP_walk in all memory,
> and list_add().
>
> This change requires of_remove_property() in case anything fails after
> of_add_property(), but we get to do tce_setrange_multi_pSeriesLP_walk
> in all memory, which looks the most expensive operation, only if
> everything else succeeds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
> index 955cf095416c..48c029386d94 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
> @@ -1122,6 +1122,35 @@ static void reset_dma_window(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *par_dn)
> ret);
> }
>
> +static struct property *ddw_property_create(const char *propname, u32 liobn, u64 dma_addr,
> + u32 page_shift, u32 window_shift)
> +{
> + struct dynamic_dma_window_prop *ddwprop;
> + struct property *win64;
> +
> + win64 = kzalloc(sizeof(*win64), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!win64)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + win64->name = kstrdup(propname, GFP_KERNEL);
> + ddwprop = kzalloc(sizeof(*ddwprop), GFP_KERNEL);
> + win64->value = ddwprop;
> + win64->length = sizeof(*ddwprop);
> + if (!win64->name || !win64->value) {
> + kfree(win64);
> + kfree(win64->name);
> + kfree(win64->value);
Wrong order.
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + ddwprop->liobn = cpu_to_be32(liobn);
> + ddwprop->dma_base = cpu_to_be64(dma_addr);
> + ddwprop->tce_shift = cpu_to_be32(page_shift);
> + ddwprop->window_shift = cpu_to_be32(window_shift);
> +
> + return win64;
> +}
> +
> /* Return largest page shift based on "IO Page Sizes" output of ibm,query-pe-dma-window. */
> static int iommu_get_page_shift(u32 query_page_size)
> {
> @@ -1167,11 +1196,11 @@ static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn)
> struct ddw_query_response query;
> struct ddw_create_response create;
> int page_shift;
> + u64 win_addr;
> struct device_node *dn;
> u32 ddw_avail[DDW_APPLICABLE_SIZE];
> struct direct_window *window;
> struct property *win64 = NULL;
> - struct dynamic_dma_window_prop *ddwprop;
> struct failed_ddw_pdn *fpdn;
> bool default_win_removed = false;
> bool pmem_present;
> @@ -1286,65 +1315,54 @@ static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn)
> 1ULL << page_shift);
> goto out_failed;
> }
> - win64 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct property), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!win64) {
> - dev_info(&dev->dev,
> - "couldn't allocate property for 64bit dma window\n");
> - goto out_failed;
> - }
> - win64->name = kstrdup(DIRECT64_PROPNAME, GFP_KERNEL);
> - win64->value = ddwprop = kmalloc(sizeof(*ddwprop), GFP_KERNEL);
> - win64->length = sizeof(*ddwprop);
> - if (!win64->name || !win64->value) {
> - dev_info(&dev->dev,
> - "couldn't allocate property name and value\n");
> - goto out_free_prop;
> - }
>
> ret = create_ddw(dev, ddw_avail, &create, page_shift, len);
> if (ret != 0)
> - goto out_free_prop;
> -
> - ddwprop->liobn = cpu_to_be32(create.liobn);
> - ddwprop->dma_base = cpu_to_be64(((u64)create.addr_hi << 32) |
> - create.addr_lo);
> - ddwprop->tce_shift = cpu_to_be32(page_shift);
> - ddwprop->window_shift = cpu_to_be32(len);
> + goto out_failed;
>
> dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "created tce table LIOBN 0x%x for %pOF\n",
> create.liobn, dn);
>
> - window = ddw_list_new_entry(pdn, ddwprop);
> + win_addr = ((u64)create.addr_hi << 32) | create.addr_lo;
> + win64 = ddw_property_create(DIRECT64_PROPNAME, create.liobn, win_addr,
> + page_shift, len);
> + if (!win64) {
> + dev_info(&dev->dev,
> + "couldn't allocate property, property name, or value\n");
> + goto out_del_win;
> + }
> +
> + ret = of_add_property(pdn, win64);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&dev->dev, "unable to add dma window property for %pOF: %d",
> + pdn, ret);
> + goto out_free_prop;
> + }
> +
> + window = ddw_list_new_entry(pdn, win64->value);
> if (!window)
> - goto out_clear_window;
> + goto out_del_prop;
>
> ret = walk_system_ram_range(0, memblock_end_of_DRAM() >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> win64->value, tce_setrange_multi_pSeriesLP_walk);
> if (ret) {
> dev_info(&dev->dev, "failed to map direct window for %pOF: %d\n",
> dn, ret);
> - goto out_free_window;
> - }
> -
> - ret = of_add_property(pdn, win64);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&dev->dev, "unable to add dma window property for %pOF: %d",
> - pdn, ret);
> - goto out_free_window;
> + goto out_del_list;
> }
>
> spin_lock(&direct_window_list_lock);
> list_add(&window->list, &direct_window_list);
> spin_unlock(&direct_window_list_lock);
>
> - dev->dev.archdata.dma_offset = be64_to_cpu(ddwprop->dma_base);
> + dev->dev.archdata.dma_offset = win_addr;
> goto out_unlock;
>
> -out_free_window:
> +out_del_list:
> kfree(window);
>
> -out_clear_window:
> - remove_ddw(pdn, true);
> +out_del_prop:
> + of_remove_property(pdn, win64);
>
> out_free_prop:
> kfree(win64->name);
> @@ -1352,6 +1370,9 @@ static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn)
> kfree(win64);
> win64 = NULL;
>
> +out_del_win:
(I would not bother but since I am commenting on the patch)
nit: the new name is not that much better than the old
"out_clear_window:" ("out_remove_win" would be a bit better) and it does
make reviewing a little bit harder. Thanks,
> + remove_ddw(pdn, true);
> +
> out_failed:
> if (default_win_removed)
> reset_dma_window(dev, pdn);
>
--
Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists