[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFr9PX=QeON1C_25tyNK1rWGm3A_Kc2Ad5qLUCfunmdHQUsv_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 23:02:42 +0900
From: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ARM: mstar: Add header with macros for RIU
register access
Hi Arnd,
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 22:48, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> The __iomem token comes after the type, so this should be 'void __iomem *'.
>
Bit of copy/paste fail. Fixed.
> > + return readw_relaxed(reg + 4) << 16 | readw_relaxed(reg);
>
> This should probably be using 'readw' instead of 'readw_relaxed'. If you
> absolutely need to use one of the relaxed accessors somewhere,
> better add both sets and make sure drivers use the non-relaxed version
> by default.
I'll add a relaxed/non-relaxed version of each.
Because of the heavy memory barrier to access one 32 bit register
we'll hit the barrier twice in the non-relaxed version.
And we don't need to hit the barrier at all because it doesn't
actually matter for IO. Is there something better I can do there?
> Maybe both types of accessors can be in a single header.
That makes sense. I'll merge them. Would this header be something that
could go in alone without anything that uses them in mainline right
now?
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists