[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YILclD/XF1Ww6H7g@builder.lan>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:41:24 -0500
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, robdclark@...omium.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@...el.com>,
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Linus W <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/27] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Move all the
chip-related init to the start
On Fri 16 Apr 17:39 CDT 2021, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> This is just code motion of the probe routine to move all the things
> that are for the "whole chip" (instead of the GPIO parts or the
> MIPI-to-eDP parts) together at the start of probe. This is in
> preparation for breaking the driver into sub-drivers.
>
> Since we're using devm for all of the "whole chip" stuff this is
> actually quite easy now.
>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Regards,
Bjorn
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> (no changes since v1)
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index 53f1f7b3022f..57bc489a0412 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -1253,12 +1253,6 @@ static int ti_sn65dsi86_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> return PTR_ERR(pdata->regmap);
> }
>
> - ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dev->of_node, 1, 0, &pdata->panel, NULL);
> - if (ret) {
> - DRM_ERROR("could not find any panel node\n");
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> pdata->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> if (IS_ERR(pdata->enable_gpio)) {
> DRM_ERROR("failed to get enable gpio from DT\n");
> @@ -1266,8 +1260,6 @@ static int ti_sn65dsi86_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes(pdata, dev->of_node);
> -
> ret = ti_sn65dsi86_parse_regulators(pdata);
> if (ret) {
> DRM_ERROR("failed to parse regulators\n");
> @@ -1278,12 +1270,22 @@ static int ti_sn65dsi86_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> if (IS_ERR(pdata->refclk))
> return PTR_ERR(pdata->refclk);
>
> - ret = ti_sn_bridge_parse_dsi_host(pdata);
> + pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, ti_sn65dsi86_runtime_disable, dev);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> - ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, ti_sn65dsi86_runtime_disable, dev);
> + ti_sn65dsi86_debugfs_init(pdata);
> +
> + ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dev->of_node, 1, 0, &pdata->panel, NULL);
> + if (ret) {
> + DRM_ERROR("could not find any panel node\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes(pdata, dev->of_node);
> +
> + ret = ti_sn_bridge_parse_dsi_host(pdata);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1301,8 +1303,6 @@ static int ti_sn65dsi86_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>
> drm_bridge_add(&pdata->bridge);
>
> - ti_sn65dsi86_debugfs_init(pdata);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.31.1.368.gbe11c130af-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists