[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YILj7PfX+IOrF1zE@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 17:12:44 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:15:41AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:05:11PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> > There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> Build test:
> mips (gcc version 10.3.1 20210419): 63 configs -> no new failure
> arm (gcc version 10.3.1 20210419): 105 configs -> no new failure
> x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure
>
> Boot test:
> x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
> x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression.
> arm: Booted on rpi3b. No regression.
>
> Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Sudip
Thanks for testing and letting me know.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists