[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIL5+xq+LP5/YGvO@orome.fritz.box>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:46:51 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/8] pwm: pca9685: Switch to atomic API
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:39:01PM +0200, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 09:51:50PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 02:14:48PM +0200, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > > The switch to the atomic API goes hand in hand with a few fixes to
> > > previously experienced issues:
> > > - The duty cycle is no longer lost after disable/enable (previously the
> > > OFF registers were cleared in disable and the user was required to
> > > call config to restore the duty cycle settings)
> > > - If one sets a period resulting in the same prescale register value,
> > > the sleep and write to the register is now skipped
> > > - Previously, only the full ON bit was toggled in GPIO mode (and full
> > > OFF cleared if set to high), which could result in both full OFF and
> > > full ON not being set and on=0, off=0, which is not allowed according
> > > to the datasheet
> > > - The OFF registers were reset to 0 in probe, which could lead to the
> > > forbidden on=0, off=0. Fixed by resetting to POR default (full OFF)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
> >
> > (I sent my ack to v8 before, but indeed this was the version I intended
> > to ack)
> >
> > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
>
> Thierry: Do you think we can get patches 1 to 3 into 5.13-rc1?
Applied patches 1-3, thanks.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists