[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210423165033.GB252852@localhost>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:20:33 +0530
From: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mh12gx2825@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] staging: media: atomisp: code cleanup fixes
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:09:08AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Deepak,
>
> Something weird is going on. This series didn't appear in patchwork
> (https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/) and looking at lore.kernel.org:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20210421181101.JySzrynV5EUsi4N5Dh97QA9VUOQjMutu0mNTW7capUw@z/T/#r4d9987c800c28c26c96464bb56916bf0408b4738
>
> it appears v3 was seen as replied to the v1 posts instead of a new thread.
>
> It's probably related to the Message-Id field, which is the same for the
> v1 and v3 posts. Not really sure how you managed that :-)
>
> Please repost so that the v3 series is picked up by patchwork.
Hello Hans,
Thank you for looking into the patch set. I am really not sure what
happened here. I followed the usual steps and resent the patch set with
suggested changes. My apologies for the trouble.
I will resend the patch set as suggested. Is there anything I can
validate at my end to ensure it is different before sending the set
across?
Thank you,
deepak.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> On 21/04/2021 20:11, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > This patch set addresses different kinds of checkpatch WARNING and
> > CHECK complaints.
> >
> > Note: The patches should be applied in the ascending order.
> >
> > Changes since v2:
> > Generic change:
> > 1. Correct patch versioning in patch subject
> >
> > Patch Specific change:
> > 1. patch 1/6 : none
> > 2. patch 2/6 : none
> > 3. patch 3/6 : none
> > 4. patch 4/6 :
> > a. Tag Fabio Auito for the patch suggestion
> >
> > 5. patch 5/6 : none
> > 6. patch 6/6:
> > a. Tag Fabio Auito for the patch suggestion
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > Generic change:
> > 1. The patch set is being resent from an email account that matches with
> > the patch signed-of-by tag. Issue highlighted by Hans Verkuil.
> >
> > Patch specific changes:
> > 1. patch 1/6 : none
> > 2. patch 2/6 : none
> > 3. patch 3/6 : none
> > 4. patch 4/6 : implement following changes suggested by Fabio Aiuto
> > a. Corrected commenting style
> > b. Similar style implemented for other comment blocks in
> > the same files.
> > 5. patch 5/6 : none
> > 6. patch 6/6: implement following changes suggested by Fabio Aiuto
> > a. use dev_info instead of pr_info
> > b. update patch log message accordingly
> >
> >
> > Deepak R Varma (6):
> > staging: media: atomisp: improve function argument alignment
> > staging: media: atomisp: balance braces around if...else block
> > staging: media: atomisp: use __func__ over function names
> > staging: media: atomisp: reformat code comment blocks
> > staging: media: atomisp: fix CamelCase variable naming
> > staging: media: atomisp: replace raw printk() by dev_info()
> >
> > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c | 14 +--
> > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c | 29 ++---
> > .../atomisp/i2c/atomisp-libmsrlisthelper.c | 6 +-
> > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c | 2 +-
> > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c | 106 ++++++++++--------
> > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c | 43 ++++---
> > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c | 10 +-
> > 7 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists