[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210423165630.GH5507@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 17:56:30 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/14] spi: pxa2xx: Consolidate related headers under
include/linux/spi
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 07:34:28PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> We have two headers split between include/linux and include/linux/spi.
> Consolidated them under SPI realm, i.e. in the latter folder.
Why? Isn't the point to maintain an abstraction between the general
purpose use of the SSP IP and its application as a SPI controller? I'd
check the cover letter for the series but there doesn't seem to be one.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists