[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210423095743.v5.10.I40eeedc23459d1e3fc96fa6cdad775d88c6e706c@changeid>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:58:56 -0700
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, robdclark@...omium.org,
Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@...el.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>,
Linus W <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 10/20] drm/panel: panel-simple: Get rid of hacky HPD chicken-and-egg code
When I added support for the hpd-gpio to simple-panel in commit
48834e6084f1 ("drm/panel-simple: Support hpd-gpios for delaying
prepare()"), I added a special case to handle a circular dependency I
was running into on the ti-sn65dsi86 bridge chip. On my board the
hpd-gpio is actually provided by the bridge chip. That was causing
some circular dependency problems that I had to work around by getting
the hpd-gpio late.
I've now reorganized the ti-sn65dsi86 bridge chip driver to be a
collection of sub-drivers. Now the GPIO part can probe separately and
that breaks the chain. Let's get rid of the old code to clean things
up.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
---
(no changes since v1)
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 24 +++++-------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
index 9746eda6f675..bd208abcbf07 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
@@ -366,8 +366,7 @@ static int panel_simple_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
return 0;
}
-static int panel_simple_get_hpd_gpio(struct device *dev,
- struct panel_simple *p, bool from_probe)
+static int panel_simple_get_hpd_gpio(struct device *dev, struct panel_simple *p)
{
int err;
@@ -375,17 +374,10 @@ static int panel_simple_get_hpd_gpio(struct device *dev,
if (IS_ERR(p->hpd_gpio)) {
err = PTR_ERR(p->hpd_gpio);
- /*
- * If we're called from probe we won't consider '-EPROBE_DEFER'
- * to be an error--we'll leave the error code in "hpd_gpio".
- * When we try to use it we'll try again. This allows for
- * circular dependencies where the component providing the
- * hpd gpio needs the panel to init before probing.
- */
- if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER || !from_probe) {
+ if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
dev_err(dev, "failed to get 'hpd' GPIO: %d\n", err);
- return err;
- }
+
+ return err;
}
return 0;
@@ -416,12 +408,6 @@ static int panel_simple_prepare_once(struct panel_simple *p)
msleep(delay);
if (p->hpd_gpio) {
- if (IS_ERR(p->hpd_gpio)) {
- err = panel_simple_get_hpd_gpio(dev, p, false);
- if (err)
- goto error;
- }
-
if (p->desc->delay.hpd_absent_delay)
hpd_wait_us = p->desc->delay.hpd_absent_delay * 1000UL;
else
@@ -682,7 +668,7 @@ static int panel_simple_probe(struct device *dev, const struct panel_desc *desc)
panel->no_hpd = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "no-hpd");
if (!panel->no_hpd) {
- err = panel_simple_get_hpd_gpio(dev, panel, true);
+ err = panel_simple_get_hpd_gpio(dev, panel);
if (err)
return err;
}
--
2.31.1.498.g6c1eba8ee3d-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists