lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210423095743.v5.10.I40eeedc23459d1e3fc96fa6cdad775d88c6e706c@changeid>
Date:   Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:58:56 -0700
From:   Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, robdclark@...omium.org,
        Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@...el.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>,
        Linus W <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 10/20] drm/panel: panel-simple: Get rid of hacky HPD chicken-and-egg code

When I added support for the hpd-gpio to simple-panel in commit
48834e6084f1 ("drm/panel-simple: Support hpd-gpios for delaying
prepare()"), I added a special case to handle a circular dependency I
was running into on the ti-sn65dsi86 bridge chip. On my board the
hpd-gpio is actually provided by the bridge chip. That was causing
some circular dependency problems that I had to work around by getting
the hpd-gpio late.

I've now reorganized the ti-sn65dsi86 bridge chip driver to be a
collection of sub-drivers. Now the GPIO part can probe separately and
that breaks the chain. Let's get rid of the old code to clean things
up.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
---

(no changes since v1)

 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 24 +++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
index 9746eda6f675..bd208abcbf07 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
@@ -366,8 +366,7 @@ static int panel_simple_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int panel_simple_get_hpd_gpio(struct device *dev,
-				     struct panel_simple *p, bool from_probe)
+static int panel_simple_get_hpd_gpio(struct device *dev, struct panel_simple *p)
 {
 	int err;
 
@@ -375,17 +374,10 @@ static int panel_simple_get_hpd_gpio(struct device *dev,
 	if (IS_ERR(p->hpd_gpio)) {
 		err = PTR_ERR(p->hpd_gpio);
 
-		/*
-		 * If we're called from probe we won't consider '-EPROBE_DEFER'
-		 * to be an error--we'll leave the error code in "hpd_gpio".
-		 * When we try to use it we'll try again.  This allows for
-		 * circular dependencies where the component providing the
-		 * hpd gpio needs the panel to init before probing.
-		 */
-		if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER || !from_probe) {
+		if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
 			dev_err(dev, "failed to get 'hpd' GPIO: %d\n", err);
-			return err;
-		}
+
+		return err;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -416,12 +408,6 @@ static int panel_simple_prepare_once(struct panel_simple *p)
 		msleep(delay);
 
 	if (p->hpd_gpio) {
-		if (IS_ERR(p->hpd_gpio)) {
-			err = panel_simple_get_hpd_gpio(dev, p, false);
-			if (err)
-				goto error;
-		}
-
 		if (p->desc->delay.hpd_absent_delay)
 			hpd_wait_us = p->desc->delay.hpd_absent_delay * 1000UL;
 		else
@@ -682,7 +668,7 @@ static int panel_simple_probe(struct device *dev, const struct panel_desc *desc)
 
 	panel->no_hpd = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "no-hpd");
 	if (!panel->no_hpd) {
-		err = panel_simple_get_hpd_gpio(dev, panel, true);
+		err = panel_simple_get_hpd_gpio(dev, panel);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 	}
-- 
2.31.1.498.g6c1eba8ee3d-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ