linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ACPICA: Add SVKL table headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Apr 2021 20:25:24 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
        Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ACPICA: Add SVKL table headers

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 6:52 PM Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/23/21 5:36 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Evidently, this is ACPICA material, so I'm expecting to receive this
> > patch from Erik within the normal ACPICA development process, so I'm
> > not sure what the purpose of this submission is.
> >
>
> Erik already sent a pull request to merge this patch to ACPICA repo.
>
> After he updated the ACPICA commit ID, he sent it to me for Linux
> submission.
>
> I am not sure whether there is a special process for ACPICA related
> submission to Linux kernel. But if I had to guess, since I have sent
> both SVKL and MADT patches at the same time, Erik might have assumed
> that it should be merged in the same patch set and hence sent to me
> for upstream submission.
>
> > Has this patch been posted here for reference only?
>
> If this submission is incorrect, I can request Erik to submit it again
> for upstream merge.

All of the sign-offs under the original ACPICA commit should have been
preserved, then.