[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <161922706225.4054253.6359310296431247310@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:17:42 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
frowand.list@...il.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, guillaume.tucker@...labora.com,
khilman@...nel.org, len.brown@...el.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
maxime@...no.tech, maz@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
nsaenz@...nel.org, nsaenzjulienne@...e.de, pavel@....cz,
rafael@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, saravanak@...gle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
corbet@....net, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Skip clk provider registration when np is NULL
Quoting Tudor Ambarus (2021-04-23 12:12:36)
> commit 6579c8d97ad7 ("clk: Mark fwnodes when their clock provider is added")
> revealed that clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c driver calls
> devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(), with a NULL dev->of_node, which resulted in a
> NULL pointer dereference in of_clk_add_provider() when calling
> fwnode_dev_initialized().
>
> Returning 0 is reducing the if conditions in driver code and is being
> consistent with the CONFIG_OF=n inline stub that returns 0 when CONFIG_OF
> is disabled. The downside is that drivers will maybe register clkdev lookups
> when they don't need to and waste some memory.
>
> Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> Fixes: 6579c8d97ad7 ("clk: Mark fwnodes when their clock provider is added")
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
> ---
Please don't send patches as replies to previous threads. It makes it
harder to find the patch at a glance of all threads.
It also seems to be a
Fixes: 3c9ea42802a1 ("clk: Mark fwnodes when their clock provider is added/removed")
so can you please have both Fixes tags?
> This would be the second approach, where we don't return an error when
> one calls devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider with a NULL of_node, but instead
> we just return 0 and skip the logic in the core and the drivers.
With the Fixes tag updated please send To: gregkh@ to pick up as the
problematic patch (6579c8d97ad7) is in the driver tree and not the clk
tree, and add my tag
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists