[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210425083754.GF15093@dragon>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:37:55 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@...il.com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: replace HOTPLUG with UEVENT in FW_ACTION
defines
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 08:14:53AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 10:00:24AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > With commit 312c004d36ce ("[PATCH] driver core: replace "hotplug" by
> > "uevent"") already in the tree over a decade, update the name of
> > FW_ACTION defines to follow semantics, and reflect what the defines are
> > really meant for, i.e. whether or not generate user space event.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-is.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/mfd/iqs62x.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/misc/lattice-ecp3-config.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell_rbu.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/tty/serial/ucc_uart.c | 2 +-
> > include/linux/firmware.h | 4 ++--
> > lib/test_firmware.c | 10 +++++-----
> > sound/soc/codecs/wm8958-dsp2.c | 6 +++---
> > 12 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > index d5590c08db51..e2b559945c11 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > @@ -1829,7 +1829,7 @@ static int sdma_get_firmware(struct sdma_engine *sdma,
> > int ret;
> >
> > ret = request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE,
> > - FW_ACTION_HOTPLUG, fw_name, sdma->dev,
> > + FW_ACTION_UEVENT, fw_name, sdma->dev,
>
> Naming is hard :)
>
> I can take this after -rc1, but really, is it needed?
>
> What problem does this renaming solve?
To me, it's a leftover from commit 312c004d36ce that made the rename at
driver core. With this patch, the define will be more matching its user
request_firmware_nowait(..., bool uevent, ...).
> Who is the current name
> confusing?
I'm one at least :)
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists