[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba908b1d-eab5-a4e5-0c0a-2c745287d121@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:25:50 +0200
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Joshua Thompson <funaho@...ai.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k/mac: Replace macide driver with generic platform
driver
On 4/25/21 11:06 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
> This was tested on my Quadra 630. I haven't tested it on my PowerBook 150
> because I don't have a RAM adapter board for it.
>
> Apparently, the hardware I tested doesn't need macide_clear_irq() or
> macide_test_irq() -- if it did, the generic driver would not have worked.
> It's possible that those routines are needed for the PowerBook 150 but
> we can cross that bridge if and when we come to it.
>
> BTW, macide_clear_irq() appears to suffer from a race condition. The write
> to the interrupt flags register could easily have unintended side effects
> as it may alter other flag bits. Fortunately, all of the other bits are
> unused by Linux. Moreover, when tested on my Quadra 630, that assignment
> (*ide_ifr &= ~0x20) was observed to have no effect on bit 5.
Shouldn't we switch to a libata driver instead with legacy IDE been slated
for removal from the Linux kernel?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@...ian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists