[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB9OAC2fXT_wWm9tf1bKAsZfX0mO=-s8znqMMj+hkU8SCZsaVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 10:08:37 +0800
From: Yanhu Cao <gmayyyha@...il.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2] ceph: support getting ceph.dir.rsnaps vxattr
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 8:50 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 09:28 +0800, Yanhu Cao wrote:
> > It's easy to know how many snapshots have been created.
> >
> > Link: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/47168
> > Signed-off-by: Yanhu Cao <gmayyyha@...il.com>
> > ---
> > fs/ceph/inode.c | 1 +
> > fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > fs/ceph/mds_client.h | 1 +
> > fs/ceph/super.h | 2 +-
> > fs/ceph/xattr.c | 7 +++++++
> > 5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ceph/inode.c b/fs/ceph/inode.c
> > index 357c937699d5..650cad4b3ecb 100644
> > --- a/fs/ceph/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/ceph/inode.c
> > @@ -891,6 +891,7 @@ int ceph_fill_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *locked_page,
> > ci->i_rfiles = le64_to_cpu(info->rfiles);
> > ci->i_rsubdirs = le64_to_cpu(info->rsubdirs);
> > ci->i_dir_pin = iinfo->dir_pin;
> > + ci->i_rsnaps = iinfo->rsnaps;
> > ceph_decode_timespec64(&ci->i_rctime, &info->rctime);
> > }
> > }
> > diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> > index 4a26862d7667..3466845c0179 100644
> > --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> > +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> > @@ -176,6 +176,13 @@ static int parse_reply_info_in(void **p, void *end,
> > memset(&info->snap_btime, 0, sizeof(info->snap_btime));
> > }
> >
> > + /* snapshot count, remains zero for v<=3 */
> > + if (struct_v >= 4) {
> > + ceph_decode_64_safe(p, end, info->rsnaps, bad);
> > + } else {
> > + info->rsnaps = 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > *p = end;
> > } else {
> > if (features & CEPH_FEATURE_MDS_INLINE_DATA) {
> > @@ -214,7 +221,7 @@ static int parse_reply_info_in(void **p, void *end,
> > }
> >
> > info->dir_pin = -ENODATA;
> > - /* info->snap_btime remains zero */
> > + /* info->snap_btime and info->rsnaps remain zero */
> > }
> > return 0;
> > bad:
> > diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.h b/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
> > index bc9e95937d7c..76f2ed1a7cbf 100644
> > --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
> > +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
> > @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct ceph_mds_reply_info_in {
> > s32 dir_pin;
> > struct ceph_timespec btime;
> > struct ceph_timespec snap_btime;
> > + u64 rsnaps;
> > u64 change_attr;
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ceph/super.h b/fs/ceph/super.h
> > index 4c3c964b1c54..eb108b69da71 100644
> > --- a/fs/ceph/super.h
> > +++ b/fs/ceph/super.h
> > @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ struct ceph_inode_info {
> >
> > /* for dirs */
> > struct timespec64 i_rctime;
> > - u64 i_rbytes, i_rfiles, i_rsubdirs;
> > + u64 i_rbytes, i_rfiles, i_rsubdirs, i_rsnaps;
> > u64 i_files, i_subdirs;
> >
> > /* quotas */
> > diff --git a/fs/ceph/xattr.c b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> > index 3a733ac33d9b..c7d8ecc3d04b 100644
> > --- a/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> > +++ b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> > @@ -231,6 +231,12 @@ static ssize_t ceph_vxattrcb_dir_rsubdirs(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, char *val,
> > return ceph_fmt_xattr(val, size, "%lld", ci->i_rsubdirs);
> > }
> >
> > +static ssize_t ceph_vxattrcb_dir_rsnaps(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, char *val,
> > + size_t size)
> > +{
> > + return ceph_fmt_xattr(val, size, "%lld", ci->i_rsnaps);
> > +}
> > +
> > static ssize_t ceph_vxattrcb_dir_rbytes(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, char *val,
> > size_t size)
> > {
> > @@ -352,6 +358,7 @@ static struct ceph_vxattr ceph_dir_vxattrs[] = {
> > XATTR_RSTAT_FIELD(dir, rentries),
> > XATTR_RSTAT_FIELD(dir, rfiles),
> > XATTR_RSTAT_FIELD(dir, rsubdirs),
> > + XATTR_RSTAT_FIELD(dir, rsnaps),
> > XATTR_RSTAT_FIELD(dir, rbytes),
> > XATTR_RSTAT_FIELD(dir, rctime),
> > {
>
> Sorry we missed this one Yanhu. In the future, please put [PATCH] in the
> subject line in some fashion and we may spot it more easily.
OK. will do.
>
> This looks fine to me -- merged into ceph-client/testing branch, though
> I did revise the changelog to be a bit more descriptive. Tell me if you
> think it needs changes.
LGTM.
>
> Thanks!
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists