[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR21MB1271A51781DB2553FBFEAAA9CE439@BYAPR21MB1271.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 04:53:10 +0000
From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"longli@...uxonhyperv.com" <longli@...uxonhyperv.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Patch v2 1/2] PCI: hv: Fix a race condition when removing the
device
> Subject: RE: [Patch v2 1/2] PCI: hv: Fix a race condition when removing the
> device
>
> > From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 11:49 AM
> > To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>; longli@...uxonhyperv.com; KY
> >
> > > Subject: RE: [Patch v2 1/2] PCI: hv: Fix a race condition when
> > > removing the device
> > >
> > > > From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> > > > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 11:32 AM
> > > > > ...
> > > > > If we test "rmmod pci-hyperv", I suspect the warning will be printed:
> > > > > hv_pci_remove() -> hv_pci_bus_exit() ->
> hv_pci_start_relations_work():
> > > >
> > > > In most case, it will not print anything.
> > >
> > > If I read the code correctly, I think the warning is printed _every
> > > time_ we unload pci-hyperv.
> >
> > Okay I see what you mean. I'll remove this message.
>
> Here we just want to avoid the message every time the pci-hyperv driver is
> unloaded. We might want to see the possible message when the PCI device
> is removed, but it's ok to me if the message is unconditionally removed.
>
> The real issus with the patch is that the 'hpdev' struct is never freed when
> the driver is unloaded: if we print out the value of the ref counter in
> put_pcichild(), we would notice that the ref counter is still two when the
> driver is unloaded, i.e. memory leak occurs.
>
> Before the patch, hv_pci_remove() calls hv_pci_bus_exit() ->
> hv_pci_start_relations_work(), and the ref counter drops to zero in
> pci_devices_present_work() due to the two calls of put_pcichild().
>
> With the patch, when the driver is unloaded, pci_devices_present_work() is
> not scheduled, hence the ref counter doesn't drop to zero.
Yes, I also see the leak, thanks to this warning message. Those will get fixed in v3.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists