[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cea88d03-f3bf-d9cd-57be-ad3f45d82eb1@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:56:28 +0800
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/26] perf parse-events: Support event inside hybrid
pmu
Hi Jiri,
On 4/26/2021 12:17 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 01:35:27PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> +static int parse_events__inside_hybrid_pmu(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
>> + struct list_head *list, char *name,
>> + struct list_head *head_config)
>> +{
>> + struct parse_events_term *term;
>> + int ret = -1;
>> +
>> + if (parse_state->fake_pmu || !head_config || list_empty(head_config) ||
>> + !perf_pmu__is_hybrid(name)) {
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * More than one term in list.
>> + */
>> + if (head_config->next && head_config->next->next != head_config)
>> + return -1;
>> +
>> + term = list_first_entry(head_config, struct parse_events_term, list);
>> + if (term && term->config && strcmp(term->config, "event")) {
>
> so 'event' is set only for HW events, I don't see it being for other
> types.. also should the check be !strcmp ?
>
For some HW events, such as branch-instructions, branch-misses and other HW events which are defined
under /sys/devices/cpu_core/events, the term->config is "event". For these events, we don't need to
do the second parsing. So I just use 'strcmp(term->config, "event")' to avoid the second parsing.
If we check with !strcmp, the second parsing will be executed but the result after parsing should be
empty.
> also please add some tests for cache events with pmu syntax
>
OK, I will add new test case for that.
Thanks
Jin Yao
> jirka
>
>> + ret = parse_events__with_hybrid_pmu(parse_state, term->config,
>> + name, list);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> int parse_events_add_pmu(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
>> struct list_head *list, char *name,
>> struct list_head *head_config,
>> @@ -1567,6 +1598,11 @@ int parse_events_add_pmu(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
>> if (pmu->default_config && get_config_chgs(pmu, head_config, &config_terms))
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> + if (!parse_events__inside_hybrid_pmu(parse_state, list, name,
>> + head_config)) {
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (!parse_state->fake_pmu && perf_pmu__config(pmu, &attr, head_config, parse_state->error)) {
>> struct evsel_config_term *pos, *tmp;
>>
>> @@ -2183,6 +2219,33 @@ int parse_events_terms(struct list_head *terms, const char *str)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int parse_events__with_hybrid_pmu(struct parse_events_state *parse_state,
>> + const char *str, char *pmu_name,
>> + struct list_head *list)
>> +{
>> + struct parse_events_state ps = {
>> + .list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(ps.list),
>> + .stoken = PE_START_EVENTS,
>> + .hybrid_pmu_name = pmu_name,
>> + .idx = parse_state->idx,
>> + };
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = parse_events__scanner(str, &ps);
>> + perf_pmu__parse_cleanup();
>> +
>> + if (!ret) {
>> + if (!list_empty(&ps.list)) {
>> + list_splice(&ps.list, list);
>> + parse_state->idx = ps.idx;
>> + return 0;
>> + } else
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> int __parse_events(struct evlist *evlist, const char *str,
>> struct parse_events_error *err, struct perf_pmu *fake_pmu)
>> {
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists