[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210426233823.GT1904484@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:38:23 -0700
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
darrick.wong@...cle.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
willy@...radead.org, jack@...e.cz, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, david@...morbit.com, hch@....de,
rgoldwyn@...e.de, Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] fsdax: Factor helpers to simplify dax fault code
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:44:59PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> The dax page fault code is too long and a bit difficult to read. And it
> is hard to understand when we trying to add new features. Some of the
> PTE/PMD codes have similar logic. So, factor them as helper functions to
> simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> fs/dax.c | 153 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index b3d27fdc6775..f843fb8fbbf1 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
[snip]
> @@ -1355,19 +1379,8 @@ static vm_fault_t dax_iomap_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf, pfn_t *pfnp,
> entry = dax_insert_entry(&xas, mapping, vmf, entry, pfn,
> 0, write && !sync);
>
> - /*
> - * If we are doing synchronous page fault and inode needs fsync,
> - * we can insert PTE into page tables only after that happens.
> - * Skip insertion for now and return the pfn so that caller can
> - * insert it after fsync is done.
> - */
> if (sync) {
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pfnp)) {
> - error = -EIO;
> - goto error_finish_iomap;
> - }
> - *pfnp = pfn;
> - ret = VM_FAULT_NEEDDSYNC | major;
> + ret = dax_fault_synchronous_pfnp(pfnp, pfn);
I commented on the previous version... So I'll ask here too.
Why is it ok to drop 'major' here?
Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists