[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW_Mf49yLVt+BJjNNLi+H5C-qaaWFfjQNBr5iuSo25xZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:06:16 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Amireddy Mallikarjuna reddy
<mallikarjunax.reddy@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-leds <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: LEDS_BLINK_LGM should depend on X86
Hi Pavel,
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 10:57 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > The Intel Lightning Mountain (LGM) Serial Shift Output controller (SSO)
> > is only present on Intel Lightning Mountain SoCs. Hence add a
> > dependency on X86, to prevent asking the user about this driver when
> > configuring a kernel without Intel Lightning Mountain platform support.
> >
> > While at it, merge the other dependencies into a single statement.
> >
> > Fixes: c3987cd2bca34ddf ("leds: lgm: Add LED controller driver for LGM SoC")
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>
> This rejected, so I applied it by hand.
Thank you!
> I'm deleting the Fixes tag --
> we don't want this in stable.
Why not? Shouldn't people running stable be shielded from useless
questions while configuring their kernels?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists