[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIaePJGgD+FEQAUF@alley>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:04:28 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] dump_stack: Add vmlinux build ID to stack traces
On Tue 2021-04-20 14:49:54, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Add the running kernel's build ID[1] to the stacktrace information
> header. This makes it simpler for developers to locate the vmlinux with
> full debuginfo for a particular kernel stacktrace. Combined with
> scripts/decode_stracktrace.sh, a developer can download the correct
> vmlinux from a debuginfod[2] server and find the exact file and line
> number for the functions plus offsets in a stacktrace.
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/buildid.h b/include/linux/buildid.h
> index f375900cf9ed..3b7a0ff4642f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/buildid.h
> +++ b/include/linux/buildid.h
> @@ -10,7 +10,11 @@ int build_id_parse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned char *build_id,
> __u32 *size);
> int build_id_parse_buf(const void *buf, unsigned char *build_id, u32 buf_size);
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACKTRACE_BUILD_ID) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRASH_CORE)
Why is this enabled for CONFIG_CRASH_CORE, please?
Is some crash_core code going to printk it id even when
CONFIG_STACKTRACE_BUILD_ID is disabled?
Anyway, this condition should be added in the patch when a code is
really going to depend on it. Or the intention should be explained
in the commit message at least.
> extern unsigned char vmlinux_build_id[BUILD_ID_SIZE_MAX];
> void init_vmlinux_build_id(void);
> +#else
> +static inline void init_vmlinux_build_id(void) { }
> +#endif
Otherwise, the patch looks good to me.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists