[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BY5PR12MB41318EB561C2E936B0371B5EDF429@BY5PR12MB4131.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:55:00 +0000
From: Vladimir Isaev <Vladimir.Isaev@...opsys.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ARC: Use max_high_pfn as a HIGHMEM zone border
Hi Mike,
On Mon, April 26, 2021 2:29 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 01:10:04PM +0300, Vladimir Isaev wrote:
> > - max_zone_pfn[ZONE_HIGHMEM] = min_low_pfn;
> > + max_zone_pfn[ZONE_HIGHMEM] = max_high_pfn;
>
> This is correct with PAE40, but it will break !PAE40 when "highmem" has lower
> addresses than lowmem.
>
> It rather should be something like:
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARC_HAS_PAE40))
> max_zone_pfn[ZONE_HIGHMEM] = max_high_pfn;
> else
> max_zone_pfn[ZONE_HIGHMEM] = min_low_pfn;
>
Not sure if I understand why we should have min_low_pfn here. In !PAE40 case max_high_pfn just will be smaller than min_low_pfn.
Thank you,
Vladimir Isaev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists