[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <898a9b18-4578-cb9d-ece7-f45ba5b7bb89@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 14:32:26 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM_GET_SREGS2 /
KVM_SET_SREGS2
On 26/04/21 13:13, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> + if (sregs2->flags & KVM_SREGS2_FLAGS_PDPTRS_VALID) {
> +
> + if (!is_pae_paging(vcpu))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + for (i = 0 ; i < 4 ; i++)
> + kvm_pdptr_write(vcpu, i, sregs2->pdptrs[i]);
> +
> + kvm_register_mark_dirty(vcpu, VCPU_EXREG_PDPTR);
> + mmu_reset_needed = 1;
> + }
I think this should also have
else {
if (is_pae_paging(vcpu))
return -EINVAL;
}
but perhaps even better, check it at the beginning:
if ((sregs->cr4 & X86_CR4_PAE) &&
!!(sregs->efer & EFER_LMA) == !!(sregs2->flags & KVM_SREGS2_FLAGS_PDPTRS_VALID))
return -EINVAL;
which technically means the flag is redundant, but there is some value in
having the flag and not allowing the user to shoot itself in the foot.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists