[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05161b6e-6d85-be14-9e30-e61cb742f6d0@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 15:28:40 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM_GET_SREGS2 /
KVM_SET_SREGS2
On 26/04/21 14:56, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 14:32 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 26/04/21 13:13, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>>> + if (sregs2->flags & KVM_SREGS2_FLAGS_PDPTRS_VALID) {
>>> +
>>> + if (!is_pae_paging(vcpu))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0 ; i < 4 ; i++)
>>> + kvm_pdptr_write(vcpu, i, sregs2->pdptrs[i]);
>>> +
>>> + kvm_register_mark_dirty(vcpu, VCPU_EXREG_PDPTR);
>>> + mmu_reset_needed = 1;
>>> + }
>>
>> I think this should also have
>>
>> else {
>> if (is_pae_paging(vcpu))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>
>
> What about the case when we migrate from qemu that doesn't use
> this ioctl to qemu that does?
Right, that makes sense but then the "else" branch should do the same as
KVM_SET_SREGS. Maybe add a "load_pdptrs" bool to __set_sregs_common?
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists