[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIbpAaCV4rXe4YZ4@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:23:29 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...iqon.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Tomislav Denis <tomislav.denis@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 03:41:21PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 08:14:50AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the fix, looks correct to me.
>
> Here's the SPI pull request if you want to pull it in:
>
> The following changes since commit a38fd8748464831584a19438cbb3082b5a2dab15:
>
> Linux 5.12-rc2 (2021-03-05 17:33:41 -0800)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git tags/spi-v5.13
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 86527bcbc88922ea40df05d28189ee15489d2cf1:
>
> spi: Rename enable1 to activate in spi_set_cs() (2021-04-23 15:36:18 +0100)
I don't think I want to pull the full SPI merge into my staging tree at
this point in time, is that wise?
I already submitted a pull request to Linus for the staging tree as-is,
if there are problems we can work to address them then.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists