| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CALiNf2_tffc65PhLxCr3-+gmVYKGO2HjYiJVkBNa5U5HYdi9pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:37:18 +0800
From: Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
sstabellini@...nel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
grant.likely@....com, xypron.glpk@....de,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
bauerman@...ux.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>, bskeggs@...hat.com,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, airlied@...ux.ie,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com, Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@...gle.com>,
joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, matthew.auld@...el.com,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, rodrigo.vivi@...el.com,
thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/16] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:34 PM Steven Price <steven.price@....com> wrote:
>
> On 22/04/2021 09:14, Claire Chang wrote:
> > Add the initialization function to create restricted DMA pools from
> > matching reserved-memory nodes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > include/linux/device.h | 4 +++
> > include/linux/swiotlb.h | 3 +-
> > kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> > index 38a2071cf776..4987608ea4ff 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/device.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> > @@ -416,6 +416,7 @@ struct dev_links_info {
> > * @dma_pools: Dma pools (if dma'ble device).
> > * @dma_mem: Internal for coherent mem override.
> > * @cma_area: Contiguous memory area for dma allocations
> > + * @dma_io_tlb_mem: Internal for swiotlb io_tlb_mem override.
> > * @archdata: For arch-specific additions.
> > * @of_node: Associated device tree node.
> > * @fwnode: Associated device node supplied by platform firmware.
> > @@ -521,6 +522,9 @@ struct device {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_CMA
> > struct cma *cma_area; /* contiguous memory area for dma
> > allocations */
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
> > + struct io_tlb_mem *dma_io_tlb_mem;
> > #endif
> > /* arch specific additions */
> > struct dev_archdata archdata;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > index 216854a5e513..03ad6e3b4056 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ extern enum swiotlb_force swiotlb_force;
> > * range check to see if the memory was in fact allocated by this
> > * API.
> > * @nslabs: The number of IO TLB blocks (in groups of 64) between @start and
> > - * @end. This is command line adjustable via setup_io_tlb_npages.
> > + * @end. For default swiotlb, this is command line adjustable via
> > + * setup_io_tlb_npages.
> > * @used: The number of used IO TLB block.
> > * @list: The free list describing the number of free entries available
> > * from each index.
> > diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > index 57a9adb920bf..ffbb8724e06c 100644
> > --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > @@ -39,6 +39,13 @@
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> > #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> > #endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#endif
> >
> > #include <asm/io.h>
> > #include <asm/dma.h>
> > @@ -681,3 +688,76 @@ static int __init swiotlb_create_default_debugfs(void)
> > late_initcall(swiotlb_create_default_debugfs);
> >
> > #endif
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
> > +static int rmem_swiotlb_device_init(struct reserved_mem *rmem,
> > + struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct io_tlb_mem *mem = rmem->priv;
> > + unsigned long nslabs = rmem->size >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + if (dev->dma_io_tlb_mem)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* Since multiple devices can share the same pool, the private data,
> > + * io_tlb_mem struct, will be initialized by the first device attached
> > + * to it.
> > + */
> > + if (!mem) {
> > + mem = kzalloc(struct_size(mem, slots, nslabs), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!mem)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> > + if (!PageHighMem(pfn_to_page(PHYS_PFN(rmem->base)))) {
> > + kfree(mem);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM */
> > + swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem(mem, rmem->base, nslabs, false);
> > +
> > + rmem->priv = mem;
> > + }
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> > + if (!io_tlb_default_mem->debugfs)
> > + io_tlb_default_mem->debugfs =
> > + debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
>
> At this point it's possible for io_tlb_default_mem to be NULL, leading
> to a splat.
Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> But even then if it's not and we have the situation where debugfs==NULL
> then the debugfs_create_dir() here will cause a subsequent attempt in
> swiotlb_create_debugfs() to fail (directory already exists) leading to
> mem->debugfs being assigned an error value. I suspect the creation of
> the debugfs directory needs to be separated from io_tlb_default_mem
> being set.
debugfs creation should move into the if (!mem) {...} above to avoid
duplication.
I think having a separated struct dentry pointer for the default
debugfs should be enough?
if (!debugfs)
debugfs = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
swiotlb_create_debugfs(mem, rmem->name, debugfs);
>
> Other than that I gave this series a go with our prototype of Arm's
> Confidential Computer Architecture[1] - since the majority of the
> guest's memory is protected from the host the restricted DMA pool allows
> (only) a small area to be shared with the host.
>
> After fixing (well hacking round) the above it all seems to be working
> fine with virtio drivers.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> [1]
> https://www.arm.com/why-arm/architecture/security-features/arm-confidential-compute-architecture
Powered by blists - more mailing lists