[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIbxQfY6Donan+D7@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:58:41 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 103/190] Revert "thunderbolt: property: Fix a missing
check of kzalloc"
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 02:25:00PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 02:59:38PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This reverts commit 6183d5a51866f3acdeeb66b75e87d44025b01a55.
> >
> > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> > malicious" changes. The result of these submissions can be found in a
> > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
> >
> > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> > they actually are a valid fix. Until that work is complete, remove this
> > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> > codebase.
>
> This one is a valid, although minor, fix.
Now dropped, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists