[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIbxl4xKyeci1lis@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 19:00:07 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: maz@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>, Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 101/190] Revert "PCI: xilinx: Check for
__get_free_pages() failure"
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:42:24AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 02:59:36PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This reverts commit 699ca30162686bf305cdf94861be02eb0cf9bda2.
> >
> > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> > malicious" changes. The result of these submissions can be found in a
> > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
> >
> > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> > they actually are a valid fix. Until that work is complete, remove this
> > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> > codebase.
> >
> > Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
> > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> > Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
> > Cc: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c | 12 ++----------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> For this revert - the commit we are reverting looked and looks OK
> to me even though honestly I'd revert it just on principle given
> the nuisance it is causing.
>
> Actually, we have code in -next that is removing the reverted content
> anyway (but not because it is bogus, code in -next is a nice clean-up
> for all PCI drivers from Marc):
>
> https://git.kernel.org/lpieralisi/pci/c/161260e7f7bc
>
> Again, happy to go ahead with the revert and rework the queued code
> on top of it, just let me know please.
I'll just drop this revert from my tree so as to not mess up your
follow-up cleanups, thanks for the review!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists