| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20210427204315.24153-7-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:42:51 -0700
From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>,
Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v26 06/30] x86/cet: Add control-protection fault handler
A control-protection fault is triggered when a control-flow transfer
attempt violates Shadow Stack or Indirect Branch Tracking constraints.
For example, the return address for a RET instruction differs from the copy
on the shadow stack; or an indirect JMP instruction, without the NOTRACK
prefix, arrives at a non-ENDBR opcode.
The control-protection fault handler works in a similar way as the general
protection fault handler. It provides the si_code SEGV_CPERR to the signal
handler.
Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
---
v25:
- Change CONFIG_X86_CET to CONFIG_X86_SHADOW_STACK.
- Change X86_FEATURE_CET to X86_FEATURE_SHSTK.
arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h | 4 ++
arch/x86/kernel/idt.c | 4 ++
arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h | 3 +-
5 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
index 5eb3bdf36a41..5791c02864ec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
@@ -571,6 +571,10 @@ DECLARE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(X86_TRAP_SS, exc_stack_segment);
DECLARE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(X86_TRAP_GP, exc_general_protection);
DECLARE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(X86_TRAP_AC, exc_alignment_check);
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SHADOW_STACK
+DECLARE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(X86_TRAP_CP, exc_control_protection);
+#endif
+
/* Raw exception entries which need extra work */
DECLARE_IDTENTRY_RAW(X86_TRAP_UD, exc_invalid_op);
DECLARE_IDTENTRY_RAW(X86_TRAP_BP, exc_int3);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
index ee1a283f8e96..0315fb297dd3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
@@ -105,6 +105,10 @@ static const __initconst struct idt_data def_idts[] = {
#elif defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
SYSG(IA32_SYSCALL_VECTOR, entry_INT80_32),
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SHADOW_STACK
+ INTG(X86_TRAP_CP, asm_exc_control_protection),
+#endif
};
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c
index a5330ff498f0..dd92490b1e7f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline void signal_compat_build_tests(void)
*/
BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGILL != 11);
BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGFPE != 15);
- BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGSEGV != 9);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGSEGV != 10);
BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGBUS != 5);
BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGTRAP != 5);
BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGCHLD != 6);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index 651e3e508959..a40b34b09400 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/hardirq.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/nospec.h>
#include <asm/stacktrace.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -606,6 +607,68 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_general_protection)
cond_local_irq_disable(regs);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SHADOW_STACK
+static const char * const control_protection_err[] = {
+ "unknown",
+ "near-ret",
+ "far-ret/iret",
+ "endbranch",
+ "rstorssp",
+ "setssbsy",
+ "unknown",
+};
+
+static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(cpf_rate, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
+ DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
+
+/*
+ * When a control protection exception occurs, send a signal to the responsible
+ * application. Currently, control protection is only enabled for user mode.
+ * This exception should not come from kernel mode.
+ */
+DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_control_protection)
+{
+ struct task_struct *tsk;
+
+ if (!user_mode(regs)) {
+ pr_emerg("PANIC: unexpected kernel control protection fault\n");
+ die("kernel control protection fault", regs, error_code);
+ panic("Machine halted.");
+ }
+
+ cond_local_irq_enable(regs);
+
+ if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK))
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "Control protection fault with CET support disabled\n");
+
+ tsk = current;
+ tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
+ tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_CP;
+
+ /*
+ * Ratelimit to prevent log spamming.
+ */
+ if (show_unhandled_signals && unhandled_signal(tsk, SIGSEGV) &&
+ __ratelimit(&cpf_rate)) {
+ unsigned long ssp;
+ int cpf_type;
+
+ cpf_type = array_index_nospec(error_code, ARRAY_SIZE(control_protection_err));
+
+ rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, ssp);
+ pr_emerg("%s[%d] control protection ip:%lx sp:%lx ssp:%lx error:%lx(%s)",
+ tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk),
+ regs->ip, regs->sp, ssp, error_code,
+ control_protection_err[cpf_type]);
+ print_vma_addr(KERN_CONT " in ", regs->ip);
+ pr_cont("\n");
+ }
+
+ force_sig_fault(SIGSEGV, SEGV_CPERR, (void __user *)0);
+ cond_local_irq_disable(regs);
+}
+#endif
+
static bool do_int3(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int res;
diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
index d2597000407a..1c2ea91284a0 100644
--- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
+++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
@@ -231,7 +231,8 @@ typedef struct siginfo {
#define SEGV_ADIPERR 7 /* Precise MCD exception */
#define SEGV_MTEAERR 8 /* Asynchronous ARM MTE error */
#define SEGV_MTESERR 9 /* Synchronous ARM MTE exception */
-#define NSIGSEGV 9
+#define SEGV_CPERR 10 /* Control protection fault */
+#define NSIGSEGV 10
/*
* SIGBUS si_codes
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists