[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABk29Nuz-FDCk23ajcr9gS4KD-wMpwyn=ASu+yuTTT445rwTvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:35:07 -0700
From: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
To: Don Hiatt <dhiatt@...italocean.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
"Hyser,Chris" <chris.hyser@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/19] sched: Prepare for Core-wide rq->lock
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:10 AM Don Hiatt <dhiatt@...italocean.com> wrote:
> Hi Josh and Peter,
>
> I've been running into soft lookups and hard lockups when running a script
> that just cycles setting the cookie of a group of processes over and over again.
>
> Unfortunately the only way I can reproduce this is by setting the cookies
> on qemu. I've tried sysbench, stress-ng but those seem to work just fine.
>
> I'm running Peter's branch and even tried the suggested changes here but
> still see the same behavior. I enabled panic on hard lockup and here below
> is a snippet of the log.
>
> Is there anything you'd like me to try or have any debugging you'd like me to
> do? I'd certainly like to get to the bottom of this.
Hi Don,
I tried to repro using qemu, but did not generate a lockup. Could you
provide more details on what your script is doing (or better yet,
share the script directly)? I would have expected you to potentially
hit a lockup if you were cycling sched_core being enabled and
disabled, but it sounds like you are just recreating the cookie for a
process group over and over?
Best,
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists