lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 27 Apr 2021 11:05:17 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@...wei.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, osalvador@...e.de,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     rui.xiang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/sparse: Fix flags overlap in section_mem_map

On 27.04.21 10:30, Wang Wensheng wrote:
> The section_mem_map member of struct mem_section stores some flags and
> the address of struct page array of the mem_section.
> 
> Additionally the node id of the mem_section is stored during early boot,
> where the struct page array has not been allocated. In other words, the
> higher bits of section_mem_map are used for two purpose, and the node id
> should be clear properly after the early boot.
> 
> Currently the node id field is overlapped with the flag field and cannot
> be clear properly. That overlapped bits would then be treated as
> mem_section flags and may lead to unexpected side effects.
> 
> Define SECTION_NID_SHIFT using order_base_2 to ensure that the node id
> field always locates after flags field. That's why the overlap occurs -
> forgetting to increase SECTION_NID_SHIFT when adding new mem_section
> flag.
> 
> Fixes: 326e1b8f83a4 ("mm/sparsemem: introduce a SECTION_IS_EARLY flag")
> Signed-off-by: Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@...wei.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/mmzone.h | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 47946ce..b01694d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@ extern size_t mem_section_usage_size(void);
>   #define SECTION_TAINT_ZONE_DEVICE	(1UL<<4)
>   #define SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT		(1UL<<5)
>   #define SECTION_MAP_MASK		(~(SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT-1))
> -#define SECTION_NID_SHIFT		3
> +#define SECTION_NID_SHIFT		order_base_2(SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT)
>   
>   static inline struct page *__section_mem_map_addr(struct mem_section *section)
>   {
> 

Well, all sections around during boot that have an early NID are early 
... so it's not an issue with SECTION_IS_EARLY, no? I mean, it's ugly, 
but not broken.

But it's an issue with SECTION_TAINT_ZONE_DEVICE, AFAIKT. 
sparse_init_one_section() would leave the bit set if the nid happens to 
have that bit set (e.g., node 2,3). It's semi-broken then, because we 
force all pfn_to_online_page() through the slow path.


That whole section flag setting code is fragile.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ