[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210427111345.n4vey3zfpk6n7mwx@FVFF77RQQ05N>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:13:45 +0100
From: Robin Randhawa <robin.randhawa@....com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
rust-for-linux <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, nd@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] [RFC] Rust support
Hi Linus.
Thanks for your detailed inputs. I will defer to Wedson to address your
points but I had one suggestion.
On 27.04.2021 12:54, Linus Walleij wrote:
[...]
>To me, the Rust book is nowhere near "The C
>Programming Language" in quality (meaning readability
>and ability to transfer complex detailed knowledge) and
>that is a serious problem.
Compared to the Rust Book - which aims to provide a relatively gentle
and comprehensive introduction to the language, I think the Rust
reference might be more suitable in order to understand the language
support for features like Traits:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/reference/introduction.html
A lot of folks, myself included, convolve the Book with the Reference to
get a stronger handle on concepts.
This is subjective of course but I felt it worth sharing.
Robin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists