linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix spi device unregister flow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Apr 2021 14:42:19 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix spi device unregister flow

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 1:49 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 09:52:48AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > +Cc Lukas
>
> The cleanup callback has been in release() since the framework was
> merged AFAICT.

Yep.

Personally it feels to me wrong to require device_release() being
atomic. It might be that I missed something in documentation or
somewhere else that suggests the opposite.
But let's wait for other comments if any.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko