[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdpC687cHezCy5nP6BRYo-dS8COYvBBvu02f6W_dS6JEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 14:42:19 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix spi device unregister flow
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 1:49 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 09:52:48AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > +Cc Lukas
>
> The cleanup callback has been in release() since the framework was
> merged AFAICT.
Yep.
Personally it feels to me wrong to require device_release() being
atomic. It might be that I missed something in documentation or
somewhere else that suggests the opposite.
But let's wait for other comments if any.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists