[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIf78yOIngfXOxjA@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:56:35 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wenwen Wang <wang6495@....edu>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 190/190] Revert "ethtool: fix a potential missing-check
bug"
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 06:06:59AM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > This reverts commit d656fe49e33df48ee6bc19e871f5862f49895c9e.
> >
> > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> > malicious" changes. The result of these submissions can be found in a
> > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
> >
> > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> > they actually are a valid fix. Until that work is complete, remove this
> > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> > codebase.
> >
> > Cc: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@....edu>
> > Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
> The original patch looks valid and fixes a race.
Thanks for reviewing, now dropped.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists