lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:51:24 -0700
From:   Jörn Engel <joern@...estorage.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: sched: wakeup setting TIF_NEED_RESCHED too frequently

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:30:05AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> set_nr_if_polling() only sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED IFF TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is
> set. TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is only set when idle and is then sufficient to
> wake that cpu and reschedule.
> 
> If not TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG, then we send an IPI to deal with the
> non-empty wake_list.

Yeah, saw that myself.  My explanation of the behaviour is wrong.  The
observed behaviour remains, though.

Guess I have to add more instrumentation if I cannot find the cause by
reading the code.

Thank you!

Jörn

--
Optimizations always bust things, because all optimizations are, in
the long haul, a form of cheating, and cheaters eventually get caught.
-- Larry Wall

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ