[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875z06vyi6.fsf@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:24:17 +0200
From: Aurélien Aptel <aaptel@...e.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
smfrench@...il.com, senozhatsky@...omium.org, hyc.lee@...il.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hch@....de, hch@...radead.org,
ronniesahlberg@...il.com, aurelien.aptel@...il.com,
sandeen@...deen.net, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
colin.king@...onical.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] cifsd: introduce new SMB3 kernel server
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> writes:
> I'd rather see multiple patches that were actually functional at each
> stage: e.g., start with a server that responds to some sort of rpc-level
> ping but does nothing else, then add basic file IO, etc.
>
> I don't know if that's practical.
Although it would certainly be nice I don't think it's realistic to
expect this kind of retro-logical-rewriting. AFAIK the other new
fs-related addition (ntfs patchset) is using the same trick of adding
the Makefile at the end after it was suggested on the mailing list. So
there's a precedent.
Cheers,
--
Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists