linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] userfaultfd: release page in error path to avoid BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:08:58 -0700
From:   Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
To:     Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] userfaultfd: release page in error path to avoid BUG_ON

Consider the following sequence of events:

1. Userspace issues a UFFD ioctl, which ends up calling into
   shmem_mfill_atomic_pte(). We successfully account the blocks, we
   shmem_alloc_page(), but then the copy_from_user() fails. We return
   -ENOENT. We don't release the page we allocated.
2. Our caller detects this error code, tries the copy_from_user() after
   dropping the mmap_lock, and retries, calling back into
   shmem_mfill_atomic_pte().
3. Meanwhile, let's say another process filled up the tmpfs being used.
4. So shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() fails to account blocks this time, and
   immediately returns - without releasing the page.

This triggers a BUG_ON in our caller, which asserts that the page
should always be consumed, unless -ENOENT is returned.

To fix this, detect if we have such a "dangling" page when accounting
fails, and if so, release it before returning.

Fixes: cb658a453b93 ("userfaultfd: shmem: avoid leaking blocks and used blocks in UFFDIO_COPY")
Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
---
 mm/shmem.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index 26c76b13ad23..8def03d3f32a 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -2375,8 +2375,18 @@ static int shmem_mfill_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,
 	pgoff_t offset, max_off;
 
 	ret = -ENOMEM;
-	if (!shmem_inode_acct_block(inode, 1))
+	if (!shmem_inode_acct_block(inode, 1)) {
+		/*
+		 * We may have got a page, returned -ENOENT triggering a retry,
+		 * and now we find ourselves with -ENOMEM. Release the page, to
+		 * avoid a BUG_ON in our caller.
+		 */
+		if (unlikely(*pagep)) {
+			put_page(*pagep);
+			*pagep = NULL;
+		}
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	if (!*pagep) {
 		page = shmem_alloc_page(gfp, info, pgoff);
-- 
2.31.1.498.g6c1eba8ee3d-goog