lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 27 Apr 2021 23:31:17 -0700
From:   Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>
To:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc:     Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS section RISC-V/MICROCHIP POLARFIRE SOC SUPPORT with
 invalid file references

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 9:15 PM Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Patish, dear Conor, dear Palmer,
>
> Commit df29598aaf5c ("MAINTAINERS: add microchip polarfire soc
> support") adds the new section RISC-V/MICROCHIP POLARFIRE SOC SUPPORT,
> but that section solely refers to files that do not exist in the
> repository.
>
> Hence, ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test=patterns complains:
>
>   warning: no file matches    F:    drivers/soc/microchip/
>   warning: no file matches    F:    include/soc/microchip/mpfs.h
>
> The patch series, [PATCH v4 0/5] Add Microchip PolarFire Soc Support,
> never adds those files, though. Are they coming through a different
> patch series into Linus' tree or do you intend to refer to other files
> instead?
>

The actual files are added as a part of the following series.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/?series=467187

As the "Add Microchip PolarFire Soc Support" series added the basic SoC support,
we thought it is better to update the maintainers file in this series
to provide the information about
the maintainers for the PolarFire Soc.

Should we just remove the Files section or update the maintainers in
the SoC system controller series ?

>
> Lukas
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv



-- 
Regards,
Atish

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ