[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210428094811.159245-1-drjones@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:48:11 +0200
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
To: song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com
Cc: aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, bsegall@...gle.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, guodong.xu@...aro.org, hpa@...or.com,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
lenb@...nel.org, liguozhu@...ilicon.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...neuler.org,
mark.rutland@....com, mgorman@...e.de, mingo@...hat.com,
msys.mizuma@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org,
prime.zeng@...ilicon.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, rostedt@...dmis.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, valentin.schneider@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, will@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org,
xuwei5@...wei.com, yangyicong@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/4] topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within a die
On 20/04/2021 12:18, Barry Song wrote:
...
> Currently the ID provided is the offset of the Processor
> Hierarchy Nodes Structure within PPTT. Whilst this is unique
> it is not terribly elegant so alternative suggestions welcome.
>
The ACPI table offsets are consistent with how other topology IDs are
generated. I once tried to make them a little more human friendly with
[1], but it was nacked.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180629132934.GA16282@e107155-lin/t/
Thanks,
drew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists