linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Deduplicate rmap freeing in allocate_memslot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2e5ecc0b-0ef4-a663-3b1d-81d020626b39@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:00:43 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
        Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@...il.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Deduplicate rmap freeing in
 allocate_memslot_rmap

Typo in the commit subject, I guess?

Paolo

On 28/04/21 00:36, Ben Gardon wrote:
> Small code deduplication. No functional change expected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index cf3b67679cf0..5bcf07465c47 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -10818,17 +10818,23 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>   	kvm_hv_destroy_vm(kvm);
>   }
>   
> -void kvm_arch_free_memslot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> +static void free_memslot_rmap(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
>   {
>   	int i;
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES; ++i) {
>   		kvfree(slot->arch.rmap[i]);
>   		slot->arch.rmap[i] = NULL;
> +	}
> +}
>   
> -		if (i == 0)
> -			continue;
> +void kvm_arch_free_memslot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	free_memslot_rmap(slot);
>   
> +	for (i = 1; i < KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES; ++i) {
>   		kvfree(slot->arch.lpage_info[i - 1]);
>   		slot->arch.lpage_info[i - 1] = NULL;
>   	}
> @@ -10894,12 +10900,9 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
>   	return 0;
>   
>   out_free:
> -	for (i = 0; i < KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES; ++i) {
> -		kvfree(slot->arch.rmap[i]);
> -		slot->arch.rmap[i] = NULL;
> -		if (i == 0)
> -			continue;
> +	free_memslot_rmap(slot);
>   
> +	for (i = 1; i < KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES; ++i) {
>   		kvfree(slot->arch.lpage_info[i - 1]);
>   		slot->arch.lpage_info[i - 1] = NULL;
>   	}
>