[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad8138dd-3b99-bb76-3257-2d959f770d4b@csgroup.eu>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:34:28 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/14] mm: HUGE_VMAP arch support cleanup
Le 28/04/2021 à 10:32, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>
>
> Le 17/03/2021 à 07:23, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>> This changes the awkward approach where architectures provide init
>> functions to determine which levels they can provide large mappings for,
>> to one where the arch is queried for each call.
>>
>> This removes code and indirection, and allows constant-folding of dead
>> code for unsupported levels.
>>
>> This also adds a prot argument to the arch query. This is unused
>> currently but could help with some architectures (e.g., some powerpc
>> processors can't map uncacheable memory with large pages).
>>
>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
>> Cc: x86@...nel.org
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
>> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> [arm64]
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/vmalloc.h | 8 ++
>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 10 +--
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/vmalloc.h | 8 ++
>> arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c | 8 +-
>> arch/x86/include/asm/vmalloc.h | 7 ++
>> arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 12 +--
>> include/linux/io.h | 9 ---
>> include/linux/vmalloc.h | 6 ++
>> init/main.c | 1 -
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 4 +-
>> mm/ioremap.c | 94 ++++++++++--------------
>> 11 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>>
>
>> diff --git a/mm/ioremap.c b/mm/ioremap.c
>> index 3f4d36f9745a..3264d0203785 100644
>> --- a/mm/ioremap.c
>> +++ b/mm/ioremap.c
>> @@ -16,49 +16,16 @@
>> #include "pgalloc-track.h"
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
>> -static int __read_mostly ioremap_p4d_capable;
>> -static int __read_mostly ioremap_pud_capable;
>> -static int __read_mostly ioremap_pmd_capable;
>> -static int __read_mostly ioremap_huge_disabled;
>> +static bool __ro_after_init iomap_max_page_shift = PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> Must be an int, not a bool.
And the initial value seems wrong. Should be P4D_SHIFT ?
>
>> static int __init set_nohugeiomap(char *str)
>> {
>> - ioremap_huge_disabled = 1;
>> + iomap_max_page_shift = P4D_SHIFT;
And PAGE_SHIFT here when NO hugeiomap ?
>> return 0;
>> }
>> early_param("nohugeiomap", set_nohugeiomap);
Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists