linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark isapnp as obsolete

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210428123205.nkxunwubdogjyvmq@burgerking>
Date:   Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:02:05 +0530
From:   B K Karthik <bkkarthik@...u.pes.edu>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Anupama K Patil <anupamakpatil123@...il.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        skhan@...uxfoundation.org, kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark isapnp as obsolete

On 21/04/28 03:23PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 02:17:00PM +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> > Dne 28. 04. 21 v 13:11 Greg KH napsal(a):
> > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 04:35:36PM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote:
> > >> isapnp code is very old and according to this link
> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_Plug_and_Play#Specifications
> > >> from Wikipedia, even Windows Vista disabled ISA PnP by default.
> > >>
> > >> This change is in follow up to
> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210422180322.7wlyg63kv3n2k6id@ubuntu/T/#u
> > >> and https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210424194301.jmsqpycvsm7izbk3@ubuntu/T/#u
> > >>
> > >> Suggested-by: B K Karthik <bkkarthik@...u.pes.edu>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Anupama K Patil <anupamakpatil123@...il.com>
> > > 
> > > Has the maintainer said this is unsupported?
> > 
> > I've no idea, if there're any users at the time, but there are many drivers
> > which depend on this code.
> 
> IMHO, this is exactly "Odd fixes" - code not really dead, but not really
> alive too.

Okay! Does this have to come around as a v2 with 'Odd Fixes' instead of obsolete?
Or should that be a separate patch?

Or should we just wait for the maintainer's reply?
Sorry i'm a little confused.

thanks,

karthik

> 
> Thanks
> 
> > 
> > I'll try to reply to patch threads.
> > 
> > 						Jaroslav
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
> > Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.