linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] arm64: dts: rockchip: add core dtsi for RK3568 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87h7jqo3d2.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:06:33 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     <cl@...k-chips.com>
Cc:     heiko@...ech.de, robh+dt@...nel.org, jagan@...rulasolutions.com,
        wens@...e.org, uwe@...ine-koenig.org, mail@...id-bauer.net,
        jbx6244@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jensenhuang@...endlyarm.com, michael@...rulasolutions.com,
        cnsztl@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        ulf.hansson@...aro.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, jay.xu@...k-chips.com,
        shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, david.wu@...k-chips.com,
        zhangqing@...k-chips.com, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
        wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux@...ck-us.net, jamie@...ieiles.com,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] arm64: dts: rockchip: add core dtsi for RK3568 SoC

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:50:02 +0100,
<cl@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Liang Chen <cl@...k-chips.com>
> 
> RK3568 is a high-performance and low power quad-core application processor
> designed for personal mobile internet device and AIoT equipment. This patch
> add basic core dtsi file for it.
> 
> We use scmi_clk for cortex-a55 instead of standard ARMCLK, so that
> kernel/uboot/rtos can change cpu clk with the same code in ATF, and we will
> enalbe a special high-performance PLL when high frequency is required. The
> smci_clk code is in ATF, and clkid for cpu is 0, as below:
> 
>     cpu0: cpu@0 {
>         device_type = "cpu";
>         compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
>         reg = <0x0 0x0>;
>         clocks = <&scmi_clk 0>;
>     };
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <cl@...k-chips.com>
> ---
>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-pinctrl.dtsi     | 3111 +++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568.dtsi      |  779 +++++
>  2 files changed, 3890 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-pinctrl.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568.dtsi

[...]

> +	gic: interrupt-controller@...00000 {
> +		compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
> +		reg = <0x0 0xfd400000 0 0x10000>, /* GICD */
> +		      <0x0 0xfd460000 0 0xc0000>; /* GICR */

If this SoC has 4 CPUs, that's 4 redistributors. Given that GIC600
doesn't implement VLPIs, that's 128kB per redistributors. Why is GICR
large enough for 6 CPUs here? Is that copy-pasted from another SoC?

> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +		interrupt-controller;
> +		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
> +		mbi-alias = <0x0 0xfd400000>;
> +		mbi-ranges = <296 24>;
> +		msi-controller;
> +	};

Glad to see that you found some spare SPIs to get MSIs going

However, the whole point of mbi-alias (aka GICA in GIC600) is to be
different from GICD and provide some isolation via an IOMMU.  If I
trust the TRM, if should be at 0xfd10000 in your implementation.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.