| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <535e8934-5c7b-4315-6a13-4b53c241d933@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 09:59:13 -0600
From: kimito.sakata@...cle.com
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
"luserhker@...il.com" <luserhker@...il.com>,
"beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
"kenny.gibbons@...cle.com" <kenny.gibbons@...cle.com>,
"rkamdar@...ron.com" <rkamdar@...ron.com>,
"chris@...ntf.net" <chris@...ntf.net>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] : RE: [PATCH RESEND v3] mmc-utils: Add eMMC erase
command support
Avri
Thanks. I will respond to you when I get the chance to go through all of it.
Kimito
On 4/27/2021 11:57 PM, Avri Altman wrote:
> Hi Kimito & Bean,
>
>> From: Kimito Sakata <kimito.sakata@...cle.com>
>>
>> we have been using this erase feature for a while, but it is
>> still not merged into the upstream mmc-utils. Especially, for
>> the customer, every time when they update the mmc-utils, they
>> should re-install this patch again, let's try to make this
>> erase command upstreamed in the mmc-utils.
>>
>> We need to send 3 MMC commands and it is important that they
>> stay in sequence. Therefore we are using MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD.
> You might also want to indicate on which platform it was tested.
>
>> Co-developed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kimito Sakata <kimito.sakata@...cle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Kenneth Gibbons <kenny.gibbons@...cle.com>
>>
>> Changelog:
>> v2--v3:
>> 1. Remove redundant ifndef
>>
>> V1--V2:
>> 1. refactor Kimito's original patch
>> 2. change to use MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD
>> 3. add checkup if eMMC devie supports secure erase/trim
>> ---
>> mmc.c | 8 ++++
>> mmc.h | 13 +++++-
>> mmc_cmds.c | 130
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> mmc_cmds.h | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mmc.c b/mmc.c
>> index f3d724b..eb2638b 100644
>> --- a/mmc.c
>> +++ b/mmc.c
>> @@ -229,6 +229,14 @@ static struct Command commands[] = {
>> "Run Field Firmware Update with <image name> on <device>.\n",
>> NULL
>> },
>> + { do_erase, -4,
>> + "erase", "<type> " "<start address> " "<end address> " "<device>\n"
>> + "Send Erase CMD38 with specific argument to the <device>\n\n"
>> + "NOTE!: This will delete all user data in the specified region of the
>> device\n"
>> + "<type> must be: legacy | discard | secure-erase | "
>> + "secure-trim1 | secure-trim2 | trim \n",
>> + NULL
>> + },
>> { 0, 0, 0, 0 }
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/mmc.h b/mmc.h
>> index 5754a9d..e9766d7 100644
>> --- a/mmc.h
>> +++ b/mmc.h
>> @@ -35,7 +35,15 @@
>> #define MMC_SET_WRITE_PROT 28 /* ac [31:0] data addr R1b */
>> #define MMC_CLEAR_WRITE_PROT 29 /* ac [31:0] data addr R1b */
>> #define MMC_SEND_WRITE_PROT_TYPE 31 /* ac [31:0] data addr R1 */
>> -
>> +#define MMC_ERASE_GROUP_START 35 /* ac [31:0] data addr R1 */
>> +#define MMC_ERASE_GROUP_END 36 /* ac [31:0] data addr R1 */
>> +#define MMC_ERASE 38 /* ac [31] Secure request
>> + [30:16] set to 0
>> + [15] Force Garbage Collect request
>> + [14:2] set to 0
>> + [1] Discard Enable
>> + [0] Identify Write Blocks for
>> + Erase (or TRIM Enable) R1b */
>> /*
>> * EXT_CSD fields
>> */
>> @@ -62,6 +70,7 @@
>> #define EXT_CSD_CACHE_SIZE_2 251
>> #define EXT_CSD_CACHE_SIZE_1 250
>> #define EXT_CSD_CACHE_SIZE_0 249
>> +#define EXT_CSD_SEC_FEATURE_SUPPORT 231
>> #define EXT_CSD_BOOT_INFO 228 /* R/W */
>> #define EXT_CSD_HC_ERASE_GRP_SIZE 224
>> #define EXT_CSD_HC_WP_GRP_SIZE 221
>> @@ -190,6 +199,8 @@
>> #define EXT_CSD_REV_V4_2 2
>> #define EXT_CSD_REV_V4_1 1
>> #define EXT_CSD_REV_V4_0 0
>> +#define EXT_CSD_SEC_GB_CL_EN (1<<4)
>> +#define EXT_CSD_SEC_ER_EN (1<<0)
>>
>>
>> /* From kernel linux/mmc/core.h */
>> diff --git a/mmc_cmds.c b/mmc_cmds.c
>> index 6c24cea..24f80db 100644
>> --- a/mmc_cmds.c
>> +++ b/mmc_cmds.c
>> @@ -2514,6 +2514,136 @@ int do_cache_dis(int nargs, char **argv)
>> return do_cache_ctrl(0, nargs, argv);
>> }
>>
>> +static int erase(int dev_fd, __u32 argin, __u32 start, __u32 end)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd *multi_cmd;
>> +
>> + multi_cmd = calloc(1, sizeof(struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd) +
>> + 3 * sizeof(struct mmc_ioc_cmd));
>> + if (!multi_cmd) {
>> + perror("Failed to allocate memory");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
> I am missing reference to ERASE_GROUP_DEF.
> It affects the timeout, size of erase group etc.
> Don't you need to query for before starting to build the command?
>
>> +
>> + multi_cmd->num_of_cmds = 3;
>> + /* Set erase start address */
>> + multi_cmd->cmds[0].opcode = MMC_ERASE_GROUP_START;
>> + multi_cmd->cmds[0].arg = start;
>> + multi_cmd->cmds[0].flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 |
>> MMC_CMD_AC;
>> + multi_cmd->cmds[0].write_flag = 1;
>> +
>> + /* Set erase end address */
>> + multi_cmd->cmds[1].opcode = MMC_ERASE_GROUP_END;
>> + multi_cmd->cmds[1].arg = end;
>> + multi_cmd->cmds[1].flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 |
>> MMC_CMD_AC;
>> + multi_cmd->cmds[1].write_flag = 1;
>> +
>> + /* Send Erase Command */
>> + multi_cmd->cmds[2].opcode = MMC_ERASE;
>> + multi_cmd->cmds[2].arg = argin;
>> + multi_cmd->cmds[2].cmd_timeout_ms = 300*255*255;
>> + multi_cmd->cmds[2].flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1B | MMC_RSP_R1B |
>> MMC_CMD_AC;
>> + multi_cmd->cmds[2].write_flag = 1;
>> +
>> + /* send erase cmd with multi-cmd */
>> + ret = ioctl(dev_fd, MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD, multi_cmd);
>> + if (ret)
>> + perror("Erase multi-cmd ioctl");
>> +
>> + free(multi_cmd);
>> + return ret;
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>> +int do_erase(int nargs, char **argv)
>> +{
>> + int dev_fd, ret;
>> + char *print_str;
>> + char **eptr = NULL;
>> + __u8 ext_csd[512], checkup_mask = 0;
>> + __u32 arg, start, end;
>> +
>> + if (nargs != 5) {
>> + fprintf(stderr, "Usage: erase <type> <start addr> <end addr>
>> </path/to/mmcblkX>\n");
>> + exit(1);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (strstr(argv[2], "0x") || strstr(argv[2], "0X"))
>> + start = strtol(argv[2], eptr, 16);
>> + else
>> + start = strtol(argv[2], eptr, 10);
>> +
>> + if (strstr(argv[3], "0x") || strstr(argv[3], "0X"))
>> + end = strtol(argv[3], eptr, 16);
>> + else
>> + end = strtol(argv[3], eptr, 10);
> You are not really using eptr - maybe just call strtol with NULL?
>
>> +
>> + if (end < start) {
>> + fprintf(stderr, "erase start [0x%08x] > erase end [0x%08x]\n",
>> + start, end);
>> + exit(1);
>> + }
> Start & End are in bytes for media < 2GB, and in sectors for media >=2GB.
> Should also check for legal erase group restrictions.
>
>> +
>> + if (strcmp(argv[1], "legacy") == 0) {
>> + arg = 0x00000000;
>> + print_str = "Legacy Erase";
>> + } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "discard") == 0) {
>> + arg = 0x00000003;
>> + print_str = "Discard";
>> + } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "secure-erase") == 0) {
>> + print_str = "Secure Erase";
>> + checkup_mask = EXT_CSD_SEC_ER_EN;
>> + arg = 0x80000000;
>> + } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "secure-trim1") == 0) {
>> + print_str = "Secure Trim Step 1";
>> + checkup_mask = EXT_CSD_SEC_ER_EN | EXT_CSD_SEC_GB_CL_EN;
>> + arg = 0x80000001;
>> + } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "secure-trim2") == 0) {
>> + print_str = "Secure Trim Step 2";
>> + checkup_mask = EXT_CSD_SEC_ER_EN | EXT_CSD_SEC_GB_CL_EN;
>> + arg = 0x80008000;
>> + } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "trim") == 0) {
>> + print_str = "Trim";
>> + checkup_mask = EXT_CSD_SEC_GB_CL_EN;
>> + arg = 0x00000001;
>> + } else {
>> + fprintf(stderr, "Unknown erase type: %s\n", argv[1]);
>> + exit(1);
>> + }
> Maybe use an enum for the erase type to avoid the strcmp?
> Then need to update the usage message.
>
>> +
>> + dev_fd = open(argv[4], O_RDWR);
>> + if (dev_fd < 0) {
>> + perror(argv[4]);
>> + exit(1);
>> + }
> How do you differentiate between mmc and SD devices?
> And for SD you should send different commands(35/36 vs. 32/33).
> Do you intend to support SD devices as well? In another patch?
>
>> +
>> + if (checkup_mask) {
>> + ret = read_extcsd(dev_fd, ext_csd);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + fprintf(stderr, "Could not read EXT_CSD from %s\n",
>> + argv[4]);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + if ((checkup_mask & ext_csd[EXT_CSD_SEC_FEATURE_SUPPORT]) !=
>> + checkup_mask) {
>> + fprintf(stderr, "%s is not supported in %s\n",
>> + print_str, argv[4]);
>> + ret = -ENOTSUP;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
> EXT_CSD_SEC_FEATURE_SUPPORT might also contains the sanitize bit,
> as well as reserved bits that you shouldn't assume they are 0, so I am not sure that this condition is correct.
> The checkup only refers to bit 0 and bit 4 - maybe add a helper that accept &args and returns 0 if allowed...
>
>
> Thanks,
> Avri
>
>> +
>> + }
>> + printf("Executing %s from 0x%08x to 0x%08x\n", print_str, start, end);
>> +
>> + ret = erase(dev_fd, arg, start, end);
>> +out:
>> + printf(" %s %s!\n\n", print_str, ret ? "Failed" : "Succeed");
>> + close(dev_fd);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> int do_ffu(int nargs, char **argv)
>> {
>> #ifndef MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD
>> diff --git a/mmc_cmds.h b/mmc_cmds.h
>> index 9d3246c..8331ab2 100644
>> --- a/mmc_cmds.h
>> +++ b/mmc_cmds.h
>> @@ -45,3 +45,4 @@ int do_ffu(int nargs, char **argv);
>> int do_read_scr(int argc, char **argv);
>> int do_read_cid(int argc, char **argv);
>> int do_read_csd(int argc, char **argv);
>> +int do_erase(int nargs, char **argv);
>> --
>> 2.24.1 (Apple Git-126)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists