[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJRGBZxgJuc2OJfvT_k3Xmk_qsxzm=xX5wm4NqeRo7vkTcZk6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:49:12 +0800
From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, john.stultz@...aro.org,
sboyd@...nel.org, corbet@....net, Mark.Rutland@....com,
maz@...nel.org, kernel-team@...com, neeraju@...eaurora.org,
feng.tang@...el.com, zhengjun.xing@...el.com,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 clocksource 1/7] clocksource: Provide module
parameters to inject delays in watchdog
We 'd expect to see clock_source watchdog can avoid to do wrong thing
due to the injected delay or
in real life delay by doing tsc sync-re-check by applying the patch-set.
However , the noise is still cause wrong actions and the patch doesn't
defeat the injected's delay
please correct me if I'm wrong.
parameters]# cat *
1
1
-1
3
8
[62939.809615] clocksource: clocksource_watchdog_inject_delay():
Injecting delay.
[62939.816867] clocksource: clocksource_watchdog_inject_delay():
Injecting delay.
[62939.824094] clocksource: clocksource_watchdog_inject_delay():
Injecting delay.
[62939.831314] clocksource: clocksource_watchdog_inject_delay():
Injecting delay.
[62939.838536] clocksource: timekeeping watchdog on CPU26: hpet
read-back delay of 7220833ns, attempt 4, marking unstable
[62939.849230] tsc: Marking TSC unstable due to clocksource watchdog
[62939.855340] TSC found unstable after boot, most likely due to
broken BIOS. Use 'tsc=unstable'.
[62939.863972] sched_clock: Marking unstable (62943398530130,
-3543150114)<-(62941186607503, -1331276112)
[62939.875104] clocksource: Checking clocksource tsc synchronization
from CPU 123 to CPUs 0,6,26,62,78,97-98,137.
[62939.886518] clocksource: Switched to clocksource hpet
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:27 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 10:56:27AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > - module parameters
> > >
> > > If the scope of the fault injection capability is limited to a
> > > single kernel module, it is better to provide module parameters to
> > > configure the fault attributes.
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > And in this case, the fault injection capability is in fact limited to
> > > kernel/clocksource.c.
> >
> >
> > I disagree with this recommendation because it prevents fuzzer coverage.
> >
> > Much better to have an uniform interface that can be automatically
> > explored.
>
> The permissions for these module parameters is 0644, so there is no
> reason why the fuzzers cannot use them via sysfs.
>
> Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists