linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: Revert clk_hw_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <161962856274.49583.8078596005578732734.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:53:44 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: Revert clk_hw_get_clk() cleanup

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:26:30 +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> There is problem with clk_hw_get_hw(). Using it pins the clock provider to
> itself, making it impossible to remove the related module.
> 
> Revert the two commits using this function until this gets sorted out.
> 
> Jerome Brunet (2):
>   ASoC: stm32: do not request a new clock consummer reference
>   ASoC: da7219: do not request a new clock consummer reference
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] ASoC: stm32: do not request a new clock consummer reference
      commit: a0695853e5906a9558eef9f79856e07659b7a1e6
[2/2] ASoC: da7219: do not request a new clock consummer reference
      commit: 97c733654ab4a5ac910216b4b74e605acf3e1cce

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark