linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] fileattr series from Miklos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210428165527.GN7604@suse.cz>
Date:   Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:55:27 +0200
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] fileattr series from Miklos

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:31:19AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Btw, unrelated to that, this pull request got a conflict with
> 
>   64708539cd23 ("btrfs: use btrfs_inode_lock/btrfs_inode_unlock inode
> lock helpers")
> 
> which I think I sorted out correctly (the "inode_lock()" is now done
> by the VFS layer for the fileattr things, and the btrfs use of
> "btrfs_inode_lock/btrfs_inode_unlock" ended up being undone). But just
> to be safe I'm cc'ing the btrfs people involved. Please double-check
> that I didn't screw something up.

Checked, it's ok. Thanks.