[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <005e01d73c8f$bac48470$304d8d50$@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:36:44 +0900
From: "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
To: "'J. Bruce Fields'" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<smfrench@...il.com>, <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
<hyc.lee@...il.com>, <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <hch@....de>,
<hch@...radead.org>, <ronniesahlberg@...il.com>,
<aurelien.aptel@...il.com>, <aaptel@...e.com>,
<sandeen@...deen.net>, <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
<colin.king@...onical.com>, <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
<willy@...radead.org>,
"'Sergey Senozhatsky'" <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
"'Steve French'" <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 07/10] cifsd: add oplock/lease cache mechanism
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:28:21AM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> > This adds oplock and lease cache mechanism.
>
> Are leases and oplocks only enforced against other cifsd clients?
Yes.
> So, a non-cifs user of the filesystem won't break cifsd's leases?
Yes, It may be considered together in the ksmbd/nfsd interop added by
TODO of feature table.
> --b.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists