[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jF1M95MJO+gGL2rmk=rmt5u0sYR-DCJW4+Bb5WP+3W7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:57:52 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) SUBSYSTEM:"
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@...il.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pci: Support "removable" attribute for PCI devices
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:03 AM Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com> wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.04.2021, 14:21 +0200 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
>
> > In principle, in the wake of Thunderbolt every PCI driver handling
> > PCIe devices needs to be able to deal with a device that's gone away
> > without notice, because in principle any PCIe device can be included
> > into a Thunderbolt docking station which may go away as a whole
> > without notice.
>
> Yes, but we are dealing with what we export to user space, don't we?
Right, so it would be good to know why exporting this information to
user space is desired.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists