[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210429000845.GA8339@xz-x1>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:08:45 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] userfaultfd: release page in error path to avoid
BUG_ON
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 04:08:58PM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> Consider the following sequence of events:
>
> 1. Userspace issues a UFFD ioctl, which ends up calling into
> shmem_mfill_atomic_pte(). We successfully account the blocks, we
> shmem_alloc_page(), but then the copy_from_user() fails. We return
> -ENOENT. We don't release the page we allocated.
> 2. Our caller detects this error code, tries the copy_from_user() after
> dropping the mmap_lock, and retries, calling back into
> shmem_mfill_atomic_pte().
> 3. Meanwhile, let's say another process filled up the tmpfs being used.
> 4. So shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() fails to account blocks this time, and
> immediately returns - without releasing the page.
>
> This triggers a BUG_ON in our caller, which asserts that the page
> should always be consumed, unless -ENOENT is returned.
>
> To fix this, detect if we have such a "dangling" page when accounting
> fails, and if so, release it before returning.
>
> Fixes: cb658a453b93 ("userfaultfd: shmem: avoid leaking blocks and used blocks in UFFDIO_COPY")
> Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists