[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5Cbfh3Aj5-i2y+GDZ=-SZw-wLMbPMew=YTcf9Yr6ohVCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:04:58 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: "Alice Guo (OSS)" <alice.guo@....nxp.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Horia Geanta Neag <horia.geanta@....com>,
Aymen Sghaier <aymen.sghaier@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
dominique.martinet@...ark-techno.com,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] caam: imx8m: change to use of_match_node in run_descriptor_deco0
Hi Alice
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:02 AM Alice Guo (OSS) <alice.guo@....nxp.com> wrote:
>
> From: Alice Guo <alice.guo@....com>
>
> Patch "fix the built-in caam driver cannot match soc_id" provides
> imx8m_machine_match to match i.MX8M{Q,M,N,P}, so change to use to
> of_match_node which can simplify the code.
Shouldn't these patches be squashed?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists