linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/13] [RFC] Rust support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Apr 2021 10:13:23 -0400
From:   Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
To:     mceier+kernel@...il.com
Cc:     Kajetan Puchalski <mrkajetanp@...il.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] [RFC] Rust support

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:06 AM Mariusz Ceier <mceier+kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Let's assume the hipothetical corporation wants to add some
> proprietary stuff to the kernel and avoid sharing the code

Wouldn't Greg KH be itching to remove such patches from the kernel? If
they made it in, in the first place.

GPL is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for code to be merged
into the kernel. AFAIK the kernel community has the absolute
discretion to refuse any GPLed code for any reason.

IANAL.